EAST VICTORIA PARK - No.80 (Lot 49) Sussex Street - Amendment to Development Approval (single house)
Consultation has concluded
The Town has received a development application for Amendment to Development Approval (single house). The application proposes to increase the recesses of the existing powder and study rooms and extend the eaves of the dwelling towards Gascoyne Street.
In accordance with Local Planning Policy 37 – “Community Consultation on Planning Proposals”, you are invited to comment on the following matters:
- Secondary Street Setback – Council’s Local Planning Policy – Streetscape requires a minimum secondary street setback of 3.0 metres from Gascoyne Street. The application proposes a reduced setback of 0.7 metres to Gascoyne Street.
Acknowledging the existing original dwelling is located within the 3 metre setback. The proposed works involving the extension of recesses will further increase the existing variation.
Where can I view the application?
A copy of the plans and supporting information are available to view in the Plans and Documents section located on the right side of this page.
How can I comment?
Any comments you wish to make on the proposal are to be submitted by close of business 1 July 2019 by one of the following:
- Online, using the submission form below
- By email: admin@vicpark.wa.gov.au, quoting reference number 5.2019.254.1
- By letter: Town of Victoria Park, Locked Bag No. 437, Victoria Park WA 6979, quoting reference number 5.2019.254.1
How can I find out more information?
The assessing officer for the application is Planning Officer, Alexander Thamm. You can contact Alexander on 08 9311 8111 or ask a question via the link below.
For detailed enquiries, we recommend that you contact the assessing officer to arrange a meeting (during business hours) at the Town's administration centre.
Who will decide this application?
The decision-maker for this development application is the Town of Victoria Park.
It is noted that the decision-maker will take into account the comments received, however, are not obliged to support these views.