EAST VICTORIA PARK - No. 102 (Lot 2) Canterbury Terrace - Grouped Dwelling

Consultation has concluded

The Town has received a development application for a grouped dwelling at the rear of the above-mentioned property.

In accordance with Local Planning Policy 37 – “Community Consultation on Planning Proposals”, you are invited to comment on the following matters:

  • ROW Setback – Council’s Local Planning Policy – Streetscape requires a minimum setback of 4.0 metres from the centreline of the right-of-way for garages. The application proposes a 3.8 metre minimum setback (Nib Wall) from the centreline of the right-of-way.
  • ROW Setback – Council’s Local Planning Policy – Streetscape requires a setback of 6.0 metres from the centreline of the right-of-way. The application proposes a 7.0 metre setback from the centreline of the right-of-way for the ground floor of the dwelling (excludes garage).
  • Boundary Setbacks– The Residential Design Codes prescribes the minimum setback distance of buildings from boundaries other than the street. The application proposes variations to the setback of the following walls:
    • Upper Floor wall to Living to Ensuite wall – 1.8 metres required;1.5 metres proposed to south-west boundary (affecting 104 Canterbury Terrace)
  • Building Height – The Residential Design Codes permit the proposed dwelling to have a maximum wall height of 6.0 metres and maximum ridge height of 9.0 metres. The dwelling is proposed to have a 6.039 wall height and 8.539 ridge height.
  • Visual Privacy– The Residential Design Codes prescribes minimum setback distances for unscreened major openings from boundaries in order to achieve a reasonable level of privacy. The application proposes variations as follows:
    • Balcony to south-eastern boundary – 7.5 metres required; 6.4 metres proposed (affecting 100 Canterbury Terrace)
    • Living room window to south-eastern boundary – 6.0 metres required; 3.0 metres proposed (affecting 104 Canterbury Terrace).

Where can I view the application?

A copy of the plans and supporting information are available to view in the Plans and Documents section located on the right side of this page.

How can I comment?

Any comments you wish to make on the proposal are to be submitted by close of business Thursday, 4 February 2021 by one of the following:

  • Online, using the submission form below
  • By email: admin@vicpark.wa.gov.au, quoting reference number 5.2020.615.1
  • By letter: Town of Victoria Park, Locked Bag No. 437, Victoria Park WA 6979, quoting reference number 5.2020.615.1

How can I find out more information?

The assessing officer for the application is Planning Officer, Alexander Thamm. You can contact Alexander on 08 9311 8111.

For detailed enquiries, we recommend that you contact the assessing officer to arrange a meeting (during business hours) at the Town's administration centre.

Who will decide this application?

The decision-maker for this development application is the Town of Victoria Park.

It is noted that the decision-maker will take into account the comments received, however, are not obliged to support these views.

The Town has received a development application for a grouped dwelling at the rear of the above-mentioned property.

In accordance with Local Planning Policy 37 – “Community Consultation on Planning Proposals”, you are invited to comment on the following matters:

  • ROW Setback – Council’s Local Planning Policy – Streetscape requires a minimum setback of 4.0 metres from the centreline of the right-of-way for garages. The application proposes a 3.8 metre minimum setback (Nib Wall) from the centreline of the right-of-way.
  • ROW Setback – Council’s Local Planning Policy – Streetscape requires a setback of 6.0 metres from the centreline of the right-of-way. The application proposes a 7.0 metre setback from the centreline of the right-of-way for the ground floor of the dwelling (excludes garage).
  • Boundary Setbacks– The Residential Design Codes prescribes the minimum setback distance of buildings from boundaries other than the street. The application proposes variations to the setback of the following walls:
    • Upper Floor wall to Living to Ensuite wall – 1.8 metres required;1.5 metres proposed to south-west boundary (affecting 104 Canterbury Terrace)
  • Building Height – The Residential Design Codes permit the proposed dwelling to have a maximum wall height of 6.0 metres and maximum ridge height of 9.0 metres. The dwelling is proposed to have a 6.039 wall height and 8.539 ridge height.
  • Visual Privacy– The Residential Design Codes prescribes minimum setback distances for unscreened major openings from boundaries in order to achieve a reasonable level of privacy. The application proposes variations as follows:
    • Balcony to south-eastern boundary – 7.5 metres required; 6.4 metres proposed (affecting 100 Canterbury Terrace)
    • Living room window to south-eastern boundary – 6.0 metres required; 3.0 metres proposed (affecting 104 Canterbury Terrace).

Where can I view the application?

A copy of the plans and supporting information are available to view in the Plans and Documents section located on the right side of this page.

How can I comment?

Any comments you wish to make on the proposal are to be submitted by close of business Thursday, 4 February 2021 by one of the following:

  • Online, using the submission form below
  • By email: admin@vicpark.wa.gov.au, quoting reference number 5.2020.615.1
  • By letter: Town of Victoria Park, Locked Bag No. 437, Victoria Park WA 6979, quoting reference number 5.2020.615.1

How can I find out more information?

The assessing officer for the application is Planning Officer, Alexander Thamm. You can contact Alexander on 08 9311 8111.

For detailed enquiries, we recommend that you contact the assessing officer to arrange a meeting (during business hours) at the Town's administration centre.

Who will decide this application?

The decision-maker for this development application is the Town of Victoria Park.

It is noted that the decision-maker will take into account the comments received, however, are not obliged to support these views.

  • Send us your comments by 5.00pm Thursday 4 February 2021.

    Please note that only submissions with verifiable names and addresses can be accepted.


    Consultation has concluded