CARLISLE - No. 43 - 45 (Lot 102) Star Street - Proposed Pylon Sign
Consultation has concluded
The Town has received a development application for Sign(s) at the above-mentioned property.
In accordance with Local Planning Policy 37 – “Community Consultation on Planning Proposals”, you are invited to comment on the following:
- Proposed Pylon Sign– The pylon sign proposes the following variations to the applicable standards of Local Planning Policy 38 – Signs (LPP38):
- The clearance height for the sign is 2.0m from the ground level. Local Planning Policy 38 provides for a clearance of a minimum of 2.7m.
- The sign is setback 1.17m from the boundary of the lot. Local Planning Policy 39 provides for a setback of 1.8m from the boundary.
- The proposed signage has an electronic component with moving text (variable message sign).
Where can I view the application?
A copy of the plans and supporting information are available to view in the plans and documents section on this page.
How can I comment?
Any comments you wish to make on the proposed development are to be submitted in writing by 5:00pm Friday 19 June 2020 by one of the following:
- Online via the abovementioned links on the Town’s website; or
- Email to admin@vicpark.wa.gov.au or letter addressed to the Town of Victoria Park, Locked Bag No. 437, Victoria Park WA 6979. In either instance, please quote Development Application reference number: 5.2020.208.1 as part of any submission.
Should no reply be received within the above timeframe it will be assumed that you do not wish to comment.
How can I find out more information?
You can contact the assessing officer, Charlotte McClure, Senior Planning Officer on 08 9311 8111.
For detailed enquiries, we recommend that you contact the assessing officer to arrange a meeting (during business hours) at the Town's administration centre.
Who will decide this application?
The decision-maker for this development application is the Town of Victoria Park.
It is noted that the decision-maker will take into account the comments received, however, are not obliged to support these views